How To Use this Site

All relevant information about using the site  can be found above on the Black Bar, as well as all available minutes, the 2011 Annual Reports and the complete Bylaws with Amendments. Click on the appropriate heading to access them. -admin-

Posted in About Co-op, Board News, News from the Co-op | Leave a comment

Agenda for Feb. 21st Board Meeting

Real Food Co-Op Board of Directors Meeting Agenda

Tuesday February 21, 2012

6pm Bromley Room/ Library

Call to Order, Sign in, Introductions

Member / Owner Comments: Each speaker allotted 3 minutes.

Review letters of Thanks to Wesley Voth and Valerie Gordon

for their service to the Co-o.

Review of  Minutes of February 14, 2012

The President will make a request for Minutes of Board meetings to be ready for review within 24 hours of each meeting, and for all Board members to approve them within 72 hours of each meeting – via email -to eliminate time spent reviewing during meetings (and to get it done while memory is fresh). Goal is to have our Minutes ready for posting to members within 7 days of the meeting.

Secretary Sally Daugherty Comments

President’s Report

Help! Our paid staff is being forced to work too many hours cashiering due to a lack of volunteers. This means:

1. Our staff doesnt have enough time to focus on their normal duties, and

2. Our payroll is too high.

Ideas and action needed immediately!  Jen and Jill need our help!

Manager’s report: Jen Nelson

Jen might be absent due to a School Garden meeting at same time.

Finance Report: Cynthia Chandler

Workgroup Updates

Finance, Store Operations, & Communication / Outreach

Discussion

(I will also extend an expression of concern by member and volunteer Rosemary Alden  of “elevated levels of EMF” at the Co-op.)

Set Agenda for next meeting

Adjourn

Posted in About Co-op, Board Meeting Agendas, Community/Member Support | Leave a comment

Monsanto and Big Ag….Destroying the Planet?

Ten Ways Monsanto and Big Ag Are Trying to Kill You – And the Planet

By Alexis Baden-Mayer & Ronnie Cummins
Organic Consumers Association, February 1, 2012

Energy-intensive industrial farming practices that rely on toxic chemicals and genetically engineered crops are not just undermining public health–they’re destroying the planet. Here’s how:

#1 Generating Massive Greenhouse Gas Pollution (CO2, Methane, Nitrous Oxide) and Global Warming; While Promoting False Solutions Such as Industrial Biofuels, So-Called Drought-Resistant Crops, and Genetically Engineered Trees

Evaluations of corn grown for ethanol show that whatever reduction in emissions you get from burning corn instead of oil in the gas tank is more than offset by the fact that producing biofuel from corn requires as much fuel as it could replace.

Corn production, like the production of all of the crops (corn, cotton, canola, soy, and now, sugar beets and alfalfa) that Monsanto has so successfully industrialized through its business model of selling patented GMO seeds to increase the use of its pesticides, is very fossil fuel intensive.

But that’s just the beginning of Monsanto’s contribution to agriculture’s green house gas emissions. With ever-increasing acreage, where are all those GMO crops going? They’re being fed to animals, and when you look at emissions from factory farms, you’ll wish we burned them in the gas tank instead!

Added to the greenhouse gas emissions from crop production and factory farms is the pollution related to heavily processed food and the fact that food in the U.S. travels anywhere from 1500 to 3000 miles to reach your plate and must be either cooled or frozen in transit or storage. That’s fossil fuel intensive, too.

Before we total the life cycle contribution of Monsanto’s crops to greenhouse gas emissions, we have to take several steps back and acknowledge that clearing land to grow GMO crops for animal feed is the biggest driver of forest and wetland destruction, which generates 20% of all climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases.

All told, the production and processing of Monsanto’s GMO crops, from deforestation to fossil-fuel-based pesticides and fertilizers, polluting factory farms, and fuel-intensive food processing and distribution, is estimated to produce up to 51% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

#2 Polluting the Environment and the Soil-Food Web with Pesticides, Chemical Fertilizers, and Persistent Toxins, Including Dioxin

Industrial agriculture’s heavy reliance on pesticides and fertilizers is responsible for the release of many dangerous toxins into our environment, but since Monsanto first commercialized genetically engineered crops in the 1990s, we’ve been exposed to one more than any other. It’s common name is glyphosate, but Monsanto markets it as RoundUp and has created “RoundUp Ready” crops to promote it. RoundUp Ready crops are genetically engineered to withstand endless amounts of RoundUp. The success of Monsanto’s business model has made RoundUp the most-used pesticide in the history of the world.

The trouble is, RoundUp is very toxic. It’s known to cause cancer, birth defects and infertility. In fact, some scientists are now saying it’s more dangerous than DDT.

It only took about 15 years for the RoundUp Ready technology to begin to fail, with RoundUp-tolerant super-weeds springing up across the country and farmers having to resort to more and more toxic pesticides for weed control. The biotech industry says it has a solution: replace RoundUp Ready crops with a new type of GMO, “2,4-D Ready” crops.

As dangerous as RoundUp is turning out to be, the only thing worse would be 2,4-D replacing RoundUp’s as the most popular pesticide in the world. The use of 2,4-D releases dioxin. Dioxin is what has made Agent Orange, which contained 2,4-D, a source of horrific birth defects in Vietnam to this day. Genetically engineered 2,4-D-tolerant crops would be a disaster of untold proportions.

TAKE ACTION:

Ban RoundUp!
Stop Agent Orange FrankenCorn!
Justice for the Victims of Agent Orange!
Don’t Let Big Ag Stop the EPA From Telling Us the Truth A…

#3 Turning Farmland into Desert, Draining Aquifers and Wetlands

In the U.S., the soil’s capability to sequester carbon has been severely deteriorated due to the enormous increase in the use of nitrogen fertilizers, mostly to raise Monsanto’s genetically engineered crops for animal feed. The soil should be a sink for excess carbon but has lost about 50% of its organic matter, making it is less than half as effective as it used to be. Many of our most productive agricultural lands have been degraded or desertified because of industrial production.

Recent studies on the University of Illinois Morrow plots (the oldest continuously farmed experimental plots in the U.S.) have shown that since 1955, when synthetic nitrogen was first used, 40-190% too much nitrogen was applied, yet yields dropped and organic matter declined dramatically. These problems on the Morrow plots are writ large on millions of acres of agricultural soils that have been degraded by synthetic fertilizer all over this country.

Synthetic nitrogen fertilizer kills soil life, including earthworms and microorganisms. In addition to reduced yields, degraded and deadened soils produce less nutritious food.

Contrary to Monsanto’s marketing claims that their business is about “squeezing more out of a drop of water,” their genetically engineered crops are notoriously thirsty. It takes twice as much water to produce a pound of a RoundupReady crop soybean plant treated with RoundUp herbicide, as it does with a soybean plant that’s not treated with RoundUp.

#4 Poisoning Drinking Water, Acidifying the Oceans

Synthetic nitrogen fertilizer is also responsible for the nitrate poisoning of two-thirds of the U.S. drinking water supply. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizer is the major cause of the 405 oceanic dead zones around the world (including the Gulf of Mexico, the Chesapeake Bay, and the coasts of California and Oregon). Monsanto’s genetically engineered corn uses more fertilizer than any other crop.

#5 Chopping Down the Rainforests for Monoculture GMO Crops, Biofuels and Cattle Grazing

Clearing land to grow GMO crops for animal feed is the biggest driver of forest and wetland destruction, which generate 20% of all climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases. In Argentina and Brazil, Monsanto’s genetically engineered soy is the main cause of deforestation.

Argentina has one of the highest rates of deforestation in the world with an average of 0.8% of the forest cut down each year, against a global rate of 0.23%. During the period 2002-2006, 1,108,669 hectares of forest were lost. That is 277,000 hectares per year, equivalent to 760 hectares per day or 32 hectares per hour. The speed with which Córdoba’s forests are disappearing is unmatched worldwide, it even surpasses that of tropical forests in poor countries. This is a ecological tragedy for the primitive forests which shelter a biodiversity found nowhere else on the planet.

In Brazil, the soy output increased 7.2 percent in 2011, causing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon to jump sixfold.

#6 Increasing the Cost of Food, While Reducing Nutrition and Biodiversity

The business press unabashedly links Monsanto’s profits to record-high global food prices and increases in the costs of farm inputs, especially Monsanto’s patented genetically engineered seeds. Monsanto’s profits go up as hunger increases and families lose their farms to insurmountable debt.

Nowhere has the connection between Monsanto’s fortunes and farmers’ misfortunes been so clear as in India where 200,000 farmers have committed suicide since 1997. For many Indian farmers growing Monsanto’s genetically engineered Bt cotton, suicide is their only means of escaping the debt they’ve accrued to obtain the seeds and pesticides.

Monsanto has made food and farming more expensive, while reducing the nutrition and variety of food available to the average consumer. The world’s farmers are increasingly growing more of fewer number of crops (especially Monsanto’s genetically engineered corn, cotton, soy, canola, sugar beets and alfalfa). The result is that we’re eating a lot more of these few genetically engineered crops, mostly in the form of animal products, oils & fats, and sugars. The most notorious genetically engineered ingredients are high-fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated vegetable oils, and processed meats.

The concentration of power in the hands of a few chemical companies like Monsanto and the industrial producers who can most easily afford their products, has resulted in a global food system dominated by two extremes: on one hand, a plenitude of industrially produced junk foods, on the other, regular food shortages and drastic price hikes. This leaves a billion people saddled with obesity and diet-related disease, even as more than a billion don’t know where their next meal is coming from.

#7 Spawning Pesticide-Resistant “Super” Bugs and Weeds, and Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

Genetically engineered crops designed to produce insecticides or tolerate herbicides have proven a failure. Herbicide-resistant “superweeds” have increased farmers’ weed-control costs to $50/acre, as they battle weeds that can stand up to the most toxic chemicals ever invented, including RoundUp (glyphosate), 2,4-D, dicamba, atrazine, ALS inhibitors, PPO inhibitors, HPPD inhibitors and synthetic auxins. Monsanto’s Bt corn and cotton are being mowed down by resistant insects from Iowa to India.

On farms raising animals for food, the non-therapeutic use of antibiotics has created a serious threat to the longevity and effectiveness of certain classes of antibiotics used to treat a host of human illnesses. Doctors concede that antimicrobial drug resistance due to use in animal feed has already cost thousands of lives. In 2006, the EU banned the use of antibiotics in water and feed, proving that raising livestock without drugs is possible.

  • TAKE ACTION
  • No Agent Orange Corn!
  • Ban Monsanto’s RoundUp! Experts Say It’s Worse than DDT! Tell the EPA to Ban Glyphosate
  • Can You Imagine a World without Antibiotics? Tell the FDA to Protect Human Health and Regulate Antibiotics in Animal Feed

#8 Generating New and More Virulent Plant, Animal and Human Diseases

The following is a summary of a must-watch interview (Part 1, Part 2) that Dr. Joseph Mercola conducted with Dr. Don Huber.

The way Monsanto’s RoundUp herbicide (glyphosate) kills weeds and plants is by compromising their defense mechanisms, making them very susceptible to soil borne organisms. It’s not a direct killer, but it has a debilitating effect on the weed’s immune system, much like the human disease AIDS.

Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready gene, which enables crops to withstand glyphosate, doesn’t solve the problem of a debilitated immune system, all it does is make it possible for the plant to survive and to accumulate more glyphosate. RoundUp Ready crops aren’t killed immediately by the soil diseases RoundUp makes them susceptible to, because they’ve been engineered with genes from a resistant bacteria, but they are still more likely to succumb to disease than plants that aren’t exposed to RoundUp.

Among these disease-causing pathogens are fusaria, which causes sudden death syndrome in soybeans and is a major disease-causing organism for most of our crops. In crops sprayed with RoundUp, we find an increase of up to 500 percent in root colonization by this fungus.

While glyphosate promotes the growth of more virulent pathogens, it also kills off beneficial bacteria that might keep such pathogens in check in the soil and in the guts of animals and humans that ingest the crop.

Scientists have discovered a brand new organism in genetically engineered animal feed, an organism that has since been linked to infertility and miscarriage in cattle, horses, pigs, sheep, and poultry. We can anticipate that, with such a broad spectrum of animal species, which is extremely unusual, that humans will face the same problem, and there has been an increasing frequency of miscarriage and a dramatic increase in infertility in humans in just the last eight to 10 years.

The organism was initially identified by veterinarians around 1998, about two years after the introduction of Roundup Ready soybeans, which is one of the staple feeds. The vets were puzzled by sudden high reproductive failure in animals. While sporadic at first, the phenomenon has continued to increase in severity. Dairies are reporting rates of spontaneous as high as 70 percent.

The cause-effect relationship between high reproductive failure and this new microbial entity has been established, but the research has not yet been published. The reason for the delay is because they really do not know what the organism is. It’s not a fungus. It’s not bacteria. It’s not a mycoplasma or a virus. It’s about the same size of a small virus; you have to magnify it 40,000 times.

When the veterinarians wanted to find the source for this new organism, they went to the feed. The first place where they found high concentrations was in the soybean meal. Since it has been found it in corn and in silage, only where there is a genetically engineered crop that has had glyphosate applied to it. The organism is also found in manure when the animals have been given feeds with high glyphosate residues. When that manure is applied to pastures and cattle graze on it, we also see high infertility rates there.

The organism is found in the placenta, in the fetus, and in the sperm. In the dairy industry, it sometimes takes twice as much semen to get a conception and as many as four to eight inseminations rather than the typical 1.2 to 1.5. One bull breeder had to pull 40 percent of his bulls out of service, because of fertility.

If we continue to douse our crops with ever increasing amounts of glyphosate, we will inevitably see the same effect on human health as we’re seeing in plants and animals.

Glyphosate gets inside the plant; it cannot be washed off. Once you eat it, it ends up in your gut, where 80 percent of your immune system resides. Glyphosate can wreak havoc with your health by upsetting the healthy ratio of good and bad stomach bacteria.

Because organically-farmed fields are not doused with glyphosate, organic fields still contain beneficial soil bacteria that actually hinder pathogens in and on the food from multiplying out of control. This may be yet another reason why organic foods are less prone to be contaminated with disease-causing pathogens than conventionally-grown foods.

Pathogens such as E. coli have a high tolerance for glyphosate compared to their natural biological controls. What this means is that it may not be the presence or absence of pathogens per se that determines the safety of our food supply, but rather the presence or absence of the natural control organisms, which are effectively destroyed by glyphosate. Salmonella, Clostridium, and a lot of these disease organisms are ubiquitous. They’re everywhere. Our health is dependent on keeping them in check. If we’re eliminating that check, we’re going to see an increase in Alzheimer’s, thyroid problems, autism, Parkinson’s — any disease that has a tie with either the endocrine system or nutrient availability.

Genetically engineered crops are supposed to be nutritionally equivalent to conventional foods, but they’re not. On the contrary, they’re nutritionally inferior due to glyphosate’s herbicidal mechanism, which blocks absorption of micronutrients. Genetically engineered crops contain about 50 percent less manganese and up to 70 percent less zinc. They also contain less copper, iron and magnesium, just to name a few. This affects the overall health of the plant, and its reproductive ability, and when you eat this nutritionally inferior food, you’re not getting the micronutrients your body needs for proper function either. Animal products are similarly affected when they’re from animals raised on genetically feed.

Studies of pet rats are exposing behavioral differences in animals given genetically engineered feed, as opposed to normal food. The non-GMO-fed rats are docile. They can be pulled out of their cages and patted just like a cat. But try and reach in to the cage where the rats are being fed the genetically engineered feed. The rats are irritated. They don’t get along together. They always go off into their own little world. They do backflips. They crawl up and run around the cage. They can’t get any peace, can’t settle down. That is very typical of what you’d see with autism.

Doctors working with autistic children are noting many correlations between the rats fed genetically modified feed and autistic children. When you look at the stomachs of the GMO-fed animals, they have all of the severe allergy responses, the inflammation and the reddening. The intestinal lining is deteriorating. The smell of the intestinal contents is very rank. The biology has been drastically changed. Doctors say that’s exactly what they’re seeing with autistic children.

Another effect of the new mystery organism associated with genetically engineered crops is premature aging. Research done in Iowa three years ago showed that prime beef from a two-year old cow had to be downgraded to that from a 10-year old cow.

Glyphosate can also disrupt a number of other biological systems, including liver function, blood function, and hormonal function. Glyphosate is a potent endocrine disruptor that can affect the endocrine system, thyroid function, and pituitary function.

  • TAKE ACTION
  • Ban Monsanto’s RoundUp! Experts Say It’s Worse than DDT! Tell the EPA to Ban Glyphosate

#9 Utilizing Wasteful Fossil Fuel-Intensive Practices and Encouraging the Expansion of Natural Gas Fracking and Tar Sands Extraction (Which Destroy Forests, Aquifers, and Farmland)

The industrialized food system is responsible for more than half of greenhouse gas emissions, making Big Ag one of Big Oil’s biggest customers. We could deprive the oil and gas industry of a significant amount of income by making the shift from polluting, fossil-fuel-intensive factory farms to carbon-sequestering organic and local agriculture.

Until we do make the shift, we need to acknowledge that the old adage “you are what you eat” applies to energy and the climate, as well as the body. It isn’t just Hummers that are pushing the expansion of natural gas fracking and tar sands extraction, it’s also Big Macs.

The worst thing about agriculture’s wasteful ways that the more fossil fuels we use to produce our food, the more farmland will be destroyed in the search for new sources of that fuel.

Natural gas fracking pumps many millions of gallons of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds, including known carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, into the ground during the drilling process, and into the air from evaporation tanks. Pollution of water, air and food from the gas drilling industry is exempt from federal pollution laws, including the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Clear Air Act, thanks to Dick Cheney’s 2005 Energy Policy Act and its ‘Halliburton Exemption.’

In upstate New York, the three million acres of superior grasslands which are currently unused are threatened by natural gas fracking. This is enough pasture land to raise local, grass-fed cattle to replace all the factory farmed beef sold in New York City.

The Keystone XL pipeline would carry toxic tar sands oil 1,700 miles from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. The pipeline would cross the massive Ogallala aquifer, which supplies drinking water in 8 US states, and irrigation for millions of acres of farmland. We’ve already seen the damage the thick tar sands oil laden with volatile compounds can do from spills in the Yellowstone River and the Kalamazoo River. The first Keystone pipeline, developed with state-of-the-art technology, has already spilled 12 times in its first year in operation.

#10 Stealing Money From the 99% to Give Huge Subsidies to the 1% Wealthiest, Most Chemical and Energy-Intensive Farms and Food Producers

The following is a summary of Donald Carr’s must-read article, “Why the 2012 Farm Bill is a Climate Bill.”

In the 2012 Farm Bill, Congress is poised to cut 7 million acres from the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). The CRP is administered through the U.S. Department of Agriculture and pays farmers to keep highly erodible land out of production.

Putting land into conservation programs leads to cleaner water, healthier soil, and robust wildlife habitat, and also plays a major role in fighting climate change. According to the USDA [PDF], one acre of protected land sequesters 1.66 metric tons of carbon every year, carbon that would otherwise end up in the atmosphere. The 7 million acres about to be cut from the CRP have been putting 11.6 million metric tons of carbon into the soil every year.

The Environmental Protection Agency says that this amount of carbon is equivalent to the annual emissions of 2 million passenger vehicles. All that stored carbon will be sent back into the atmosphere if those 7 million acres are plowed under to plant more genetically engineered corn for ethanol and livestock feed.

Meanwhile lavish government payments to highly profitable mega-farms continue, and farm state lawmakers and agribiz lobbyists are working toward newer programs that could increase taxpayers’ burden, along with agriculture’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Save the Planet From Monsanto! It’s not enough to stop eating genetically engineered food. If we want a liveable planet we’ve got to boycott all factory farmed food and make the Great Transition from energy and chemical-intensive agriculture to a re-localized and organic system of food and farming. The World According to Monsanto is a recipe for disaster. Monsanto and Big Ag contaminate every link in the food chain, threatening the very foundation of life: living nutrient-rich soil, clean water, resilient crops, healthy animals, stable climates, and diverse food sources. The good news is that agro-ecological and organic methods can reverse this threat and sustain food production for future generations, but we don’t have much time to turn things around.

Posted in Co-op Newsletter and Weekly Articles, GMO FOOD, Health Issues, Politics | Leave a comment

Whole Fraud: Exposing the Myth of So-Called Natural Foods

  • By Ronnie Cummins
    Organic Consumers Association, Feb 9, 2012

On Jan. 31, organic and natural foods giant Whole Foods Market (WFM) once again attacked the Organic Consumers Association, the nation’s leading watchdog on organic standards, as being too “hard-line” for insisting that retailers like WFM stop selling, or at least start labeling, billions of dollars worth of so-called “natural” foods in their stores – foods that are laced with unlabeled, hazardous genetically engineered (GE) ingredients. ronnie balck and white

WFM’s most recent attack on OCA predictably backfired, throwing gasoline on the fiery debate surrounding my previous essay “The Organic Elite Surrenders to Monsanto.”  In that essay, written in January 2011, I criticized WFM and several other well-known organic companies for their foolish (now hopefully repudiated) stance of espousing “co-existence” with the USDA and Monsanto, in exchange for minimal federal regulation of genetically engineered crops.

In subsequent articles, OCA has called for an end to “organic infighting” and for the organic industry, farmers, and consumers to join forces and pass laws or state ballot initiatives (like the current campaign in California) that would require mandatory labels on products containing genetically engineered ingredients, as well as to make it illegal to label or market GE-tainted foods as  “natural” or “all natural.”

Anger is now running so high against Monsanto and the USDA, as well as anyone appearing to tolerate “co-existence” with either group, that rumors are fast spreading that Monsanto has bought out, or plans to buy out, WFM. That rumor is untrue. However, it has focused attention once again on the critical issue of food labeling. WFM, and all of us in the organic community, must put an end to labeling fraud in the “natural” products sector, by passing laws that will require brands and supermarkets to clearly label all genetically engineered ingredients on their products.

Growing awareness has created a strong organic movement

Millions of health-minded Americans, especially parents of young children, now understand that cheap, non-organic, genetically engineered, industrial food is hazardous. Not only does chemical- and energy-intensive factory farming destroy the environment, impoverish rural communities, exploit farm workers, inflict unnecessary cruelty on farm animals, and contaminate the water supply, but the end product itself is inevitably contaminated.

Routinely contained in nearly every bite or swallow of non-organic industrial food are genetically engineered ingredients, pesticides, antibiotics and other animal drug residues, pathogens, feces, hormone-disrupting chemicals, toxic sludge, slaughterhouse waste, chemical additives and preservatives, irradiation-derived radiolytic chemical by-products, and a host of other hazardous allergens and toxins.

If common sense weren’t enough, scientists warn us that a public health Doomsday Clock is ticking. Big Biotech and Big Ag are the root cause of 80 million cases of food poisoning every year in the US, as well as an epidemic of allergies, reproductive disorders, food-related cancers, heart attacks, and obesity.  Within a decade, these diet- and environment-related diseases – heavily subsidized under our Big Pharma/chemical/genetically-engineered/factory farm system – will likely bankrupt Medicare and the entire U.S. health care system.

Likewise, millions of green-minded consumers understand that industrial agriculture poses a terminal threat to the environment and climate stability. A highly conscious and passionate segment of the population is beginning to understand that converting to non-chemical, non-genetically engineered, energy-efficient, carbon-sequestering organic farming practices, and drastically reducing food miles by relocalizing the food chain, are essential preconditions for stabilizing our out-of-control climate and preparing our families and communities for future energy and resource shortages.

Millions of us – consumers, farmers, activists – now realize that unless we act quickly, global warming and climate chaos will soon severely disrupt industrial agriculture and long-distance food transportation, leading to massive crop failures, food shortages, famine, war, and pestilence. Even more alarming, accelerating levels of greenhouse gases (especially from cars, coal, cattle, and related rainforest and wetlands destruction) will soon push global warming to a tipping point that will melt the polar icecaps and possibly unleash a cataclysmic discharge of climate-destabilizing methane, now sequestered in the fragile arctic tundra.

Thanks to this growing consumer awareness – and four decades of hard work – the organic community has built up a $30-billion “certified organic” food and products sector that prohibits the use of genetic engineering. The rapidly expanding organic/natural products sector – organic (4% of total retail sales) and natural (8%) – now constitutes more than 12% of total retail grocery sales, with an annual growth rate of 10-15%.  Even taking into account what appears to be a permanent economic recession and a lower rate of growth than that seen over the past 20 years, the organic and natural market will likely constitute 31-56% of grocery sales in 2020.

This consumer-driven movement, under relentless attack by the biotech and Big Food lobby, and with little or no help from government, has managed to create a healthy and sustainable alternative to America’s disastrous, chemical- and energy-intensive system of industrial agriculture. Millions of organic consumers are now demanding food and other products that are certified organic and non-GE, as well as locally or regionally produced, and minimally processed and packaged.

The myth of “natural” remains a threat

As impressive as this $30-billion Organic Alternative is, it remains overshadowed by an additional $50 billion in annual spending by consumers on products marketed as “natural.”

Recent polls indicate that many green-minded consumers remain confused about the qualitative difference between products labeled or advertised as “natural,” versus those labeled as organic. Many believe that “natural” means “almost organic,” or that a natural product is even better than organic.

Walk down the aisles of any Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods Market, or any upscale supermarket and look closely. What do you see? Row after row of attractively displayed, but mostly non-organic “natural” (i.e. conventional) foods and products. By marketing sleight of hand, these conventional foods, vitamins, private label items, and personal care products become “natural” or “almost organic” (and overpriced) in the “natural” supermarket setting.

It’s no wonder – and no accident – that consumers are confused. Companies selling these products are simply telling us what we want to hear, so they can charge a premium price.

In fact, all these “natural,” “all-natural,” and “sustainable,” products are neither backed up by rules and regulations, nor a third-party certifier. Most “natural” or conventional products – whether produce, dairy, or canned or frozen goods – are produced on large industrial farms or in processing plants that are highly polluting, chemical-intensive and energy-intensive.

Test these so-called “natural” products in a lab and what will you find? Pesticide residues, Genetically Modified Organisms, and a long list of problematic and/or carcinogenic synthetic chemicals and additives.

Trace these “natural” products back to the farm or factory and what will you find? Climate destabilizing chemical fertilizers, pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, and sewage sludge – not to mention exploited farm workers and workers in the food processing industry. Of course there are many products in WFM, Trader Joe’s and other natural food retailers that bear the label “USDA Organic.” But the overwhelming majority of their products are not.

Perhaps this wouldn’t matter if we were living in normal times, with a relatively healthy population, environment, and climate. Conventional products sold as “natural” or “nearly organic” would be just one more example of of chicanery or consumer fraud.

But we are not living in normal times.

Demanding that natural and conventional products and producers make the transition to organic is a matter of life or death. And standing in the way of making this great transition are not only Fortune 500 food and beverage corporations, Monsanto, and corporate agribusiness, as we would expect, but the wholesale and retail giants in the natural products sector as well.

The full transformation to organic begins with us

We cannot continue to hand over 88% of our consumer dollars to out-of-control, biotech, chemical-intensive, energy-intensive, greenhouse gas- polluting corporations and “profit-at-any-cost” retail chains such as Wal-Mart.

We must not allow the “natural” sector to degenerate into a “green-washed” marketing tool that merely disguises unhealthy and unsustainable food and farming practices. We must not allow “natural” to become a green shield for Monsanto and the biotech industry in their quest to take over global agriculture.

Instead, we must demand that the “natural” sector move our nation toward an organic future.  How – and how quickly – can we move healthy, organic, and “natural” products from a 12% market share, to becoming the dominant force in American food and farming?

This is a major undertaking, one that will require a major transformation in public consciousness and policy.

But it is doable.  And absolutely necessary.

The first step – before we overthrow Monsanto, Wal-Mart, and Food Inc. – is to put our own house in order.  That means shopping for certified organic products.

What does certified organic or “USDA Organic” mean? Certified organic means the farmer or producer has undergone a regular inspection of its farm, facilities, ingredients, and practices by an independent third-party certifier, accredited by the USDA National Organic Program (NOP). The producer has followed strict NOP regulations and maintained detailed records. Genetically engineered ingredients, synthetic pesticides, animal drugs, sewage sludge, irradiation, and chemical fertilizers are prohibited. Farm animals, soil, and crops have been managed organically. Food can be processed using only approved methods. Ingredients must be on the “allowed” list.

If every one of us pays close attention to the labels on our food – choosing certified organic over “natural” – we can increase demand for organic, sustainable, healthy foods.

Step two? Demand that your local and state legislators pass labeling laws so that all so-called “natural” products move in a “transition-to-organic” direction. Tell your elected officials that you have the right to know what is – and isn’t – in your food.

If we all work together, the U.S. will be well on its way to solving three of the nation’s most pressing problems: deteriorating public health, climate change, and the energy crisis.

Don’t be fooled. Stop buying so-called “natural” products unless you have no other choice. Buy certified “USDA Organic” products today and every day. Your health and the health of the planet are at stake. And please join the rapidly growing campaign in California and other states to force mandatory labels on GE foods and to make it illegal to label or advertise GE-tainted foods as “natural” or “all natural.”

Ronnie Cummins is the International Director of the Organic Consumers Association.

Posted in GMO FOOD, Health Issues, Politics, Sustainable Farming | Leave a comment

Demand GMO Labeling

What’s in Your Food?
Consumers have a right to know what goes into the food they are purchasing for their families. Write to the FDA and demand labels that disclose when foods contain genetically engineered ingredients.

Tell the FDA to Label Foods with Genetically Engineered Ingredients

In recent years, research sponsored by the Union of Concerned Scientists has shown that the widespread adoption of genetically engineered (GE) crops has led to increased herbicide use in the United States, while falling short of the biotech industry’s promises for higher crop yields and more efficient fertilizer use. More modern, scientifically advanced agricultural practices achieve many of the objectives of GE crops, without many of the downsides.

Still, foods with GE ingredients are indistinguishable from non-GE varieties on supermarket shelves.

Consumers have a right to know what goes into the food they are purchasing for their families, and to choose to support more modern agricultural practices with their food dollars.

Write to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today and demand labels that disclose when foods contain GE ingredients!

Take Action Today!

Sincerely,
Jenn Yates
Jenn Yates
National Field Organizer
UCS Food & Environment Program

Posted in GMO FOOD, Health Issues | Leave a comment

Financial Report 1/24/12

January 24, 2012

Financial Report: To Members and Board of Directors..

The data collected in the past three weeks reflects the following:

Systems for accurate tracking of cash flow have not been in place, prior to Jan. 1, 2012.

Three weeks of 2012 (and when able) compared to the month of January of 2011:

  • Total Sales are at 65%
  • Member Sales at 55%…non-member at 78%…M-Special Orders at 136%
  • Overall income at 64%
  • Assessment Fees and new Member fees are at 49%.
  • Volunteerism hours are at 58%….per Nov. & Dec. 2011….
  • Tiered Discounts are costing us about $600 / mo. down from $2000/mo. Aug-Nov ’11.
  • Shrink expense has not been accounted for in mark-up calculations.
  • More accurate tracking of shrink = drop to 4.3% overall from 6% in 2011.
  • Accounts payable is being tracked now…..no records previously..
  • Inventory is visibly low ……down $3172 since Jan. 2011.
  • Losses to Cash over/shorts and voids are being examined for data entry errors.
  • -$91 / 3wk 2012 compared to -$479/month 2011.

The BOD workgroups may want to examine some of these operational areas that have not been fully looked at, to identify “tweaking” potential:

  1. Store hours and traffic pattern of customers.
  2. Volunteer participation, time study of volunteer’s participation at the store.
  3. Staff…time study / job description review.
  4. Policies and procedures for calculating mark-up.
  5. Review of Freight and potential Handling % mark-up.
  6. Purchasing of goods……what is being shrunk…what sells quickly…what brings people into the store.

There is not a way to collect data on the heart and soul of the Co-op, and that is it’s greatest strength.  The community building that goes on is amazing.  It has become evident to me that many folks really want the co-op to be here….

The tasks of helping us establish sustainability look daunting….but maybe not…

This is the time to pay great attention to what we want and what the demographics and financial resources will support.

With Respect,

Cynthia Chandler, Treasurer, Real Food Co-op

Posted in About Co-op, Board News, Financial Reports | Leave a comment

Board Agenda for February 7, 2012

AGENDA January 24, 2012 Florence Library Conference Room

The Co-op has a new board and the board has agreed to make an effort to move towards a new level of financial sustainability. In order to do this the Board must take a more active role in the operation of the store, effective immediately.

The Board has agreed that the best way to move forward is through the development of, and active participation in, structured workgroups designed to help both Management and the Board operate the store more efficiently and cost effectively, and also to develop a stronger financial structure for the future.

Due to our tight financial picture at present, it is necessary that we move ahead without delay in the creation and staffing of these Workgroups. Therefore I am asking that the Board focus solely on this task this evening.

Call to Order; Sign In Board and Owners present

Owner/Member Comment Period Each speaker is allotted 3 minutes

Review of January 24 Minutes

Accept Minutes

Secretary Sally to speak briefly on ideas for Minutes going forward.

Manager’s Report: Postponed until next meeting unless strong objection from Board members.

Treasurer’s Report : Postponed until next meeting unless strong objection from Board members.

Opening Discussion of Primary Workgroups and Organizational Chart.

Discussion of formation of Specific Workgroups including Criteria and Policies to Operate By.

Essential Workgroups suggested to Date include: Finance; Store Operations; & Communication and Outreach.

End of Discussion Period

Set Agenda for next Meeting

Thanks for your efforts to make the Co-op successful and sustainable!

Randy

Posted in About Co-op, Board Meeting Agendas, Board News, News from the Co-op | Leave a comment

Co-op News 2/6/12

Cashier Training

We will be doing another cashier training on Thursday February 9 at 6:15 pm.  If you have any questions please come.  If you are unable to make it this time but would like some more training please contact Laurie Stone, our Working Members Coordinator.

Board Meeting

There will be a special Board meeting on Tuesday February 7th at 6 pm at  the Library.  We will be discussing work groups (AKA  committees).  We are establishing work groups that will benefit our co-op, in hopes of helping it  run smoother and more efficient.  There are lots of areas where you can help.  Come to the meeting if you can or look for more information.

How Can You Help?

  • I am looking for someone to help organize and label our recycling bins and to start a plastic bag recycling.
  • Is someone interested in helping us post cooking directions and nutritional information about some of our products?

Items we need for donation:

  • scotch tape
  • ink cartidges for our printer-Lexmark/Black 82

Kangen Water Filter

Starting on Monday January 23rd there will be sampling of the Kangen Water Filter here at the co-op from 1:30 to 3:30 pm.  Dr. George Hutchby will be here to answer any of your questions about this water filter. It alkalizes the water and is said to provide health benefits.  Dr. Hutchby will be here Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 1:30 to 3:30 pm for several weeks.  Bring in your jugs to fill and try it for yourself.

Thank You!

Thank you to everyone who has been participating in the co-op, whether it is by donating time or purchasing at the store.  Things are looking brighter every day!  This storm definitely reminds me how thankful I am for the co-op and how important it is to work toward food sustainability in our community.  The co-op is a big part of that!

Demonstrate that real and local food is a high priority for you and this community. Save our collective endeavor.

Posted in About Co-op, Board Meeting Agendas, Board News, Co-op Newsletter and Weekly Articles, Community/Member Support, Jen's Corner, News from the Co-op | Leave a comment

Recipe of The Week

Teff Brownies

  • 1 cup butter
  • 2 cups sugar
  • 4 eggs
  • 2 tsp vanilla
  • 1 cup teff flour
  • 3/4 cup unsweetened cocoa powder
  • 1 Tbsp arrowroot or cornstarch
  • 1/2 tsp baking powder
  • 1/4 tsp salt

Cream butter and sugar. Beat in eggs one at a time. Add vanilla extract. Sift dry ingredients and then blend thoroughly with butter mixture. Pour into greased 13 x 9″ in pan. Bake at 350 for 20 minutes. Be sure to pull from oven as soon as knife inserted comes out clean. Let cool completely. Gluten-free brownies are notorious for messy edges. If your display matters, or you want folks to eat with fingers vs. forks, bake in individual cupcake papers.

Courtesy of Hummingbird Wholesale

Posted in Co-op Newsletter and Weekly Articles, Recipes | Leave a comment

Where Does your Food Come From?

You should be able to know what country your food came from.

Take Action to Keep Country of Origin Labeling

January 24, 2012

Not all food is created equal. As we recently found out, an orange from Brazil might have been grown with chemicals that are illegal in the U.S. This is exactly why we fight so hard for mandatory labeling of where products are from, but unless President Obama takes action we could lose this labeling. Can you ask President Obama to protect country of origin labeling?

Since 2008, we’ve had country of origin labeling that tells us where seafood, meats, fruits and vegetables come from. Unfortunately, Mexico and Canada challenged this rule through the World Trade Organization (WTO) and won. Unless President Obama decides to appeal this WTO ruling, we could lose these important labels.

There are many countries that have very different production standards, and allow growers to use many pesticides, chemicals and drugs that are illegal in the U.S. Without these labels, you won’t be able to avoid potentially dangerous products.

Take action to keep country of origin labels on your food:
http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=9143

Thanks for taking action,

Sarah Alexander
Education & Outreach Director
Food & Water Watch
goodfood(at)fwwatch(dot)org

Posted in Co-op Newsletter and Weekly Articles, Health Issues, Special Interest | Leave a comment

Founder of Oregon Tilth at Next City Club

Organic farmer, co-founder of Oregon Tilth,
spoke in Florence Feb. 3

A national leader in sustainable organic food production, Corvallis farmer Harry Mac Cormack,  addressed the City Club of Florence at their last luncheon meeting, Friday, February 3, at the Ocean Dunes Golf Course on Munsel Lake Road. MacCormack described the significant economic and health benefits of resilient bio-active living soils and regionally-based local food systems. The meeting was open to the public, at no charge.

In addition to teaching at Oregon State University for over thirty years, MacCormack also co-founded farmers markets in Portland and Corvallis.

Over thirty years ago, Mac Cormack helped co-found Oregon Tilth, now recognized as a lead force in national and international organic production certification. He continues farming while authoring related books and publications and organizing “food webs” to assist local food production.

Mac Cormack’s “Bean and Grain Project” is currently working to shape Willamette Valley producer efforts moving thousands of acres of grass-seed and other chemically–dependent crops over to organic beans and grains. In addition, he is working to expand local storage and milling facilities. Some of these beans are available at the the local “Real Food Co-op.”

Mac Cormack will describe how shifting away from chemically-dependent growing can literally result in changed soils types, with significantly higher valuable mineral ratings.

Additional information on his publications or related work in Oregon, including soils workshops, is available at his web site: sunbowfarm.org and
sunbowfarm.org/workshops His 4th editon of “The Transition Document: Toward a Biologically Resilient Agriculture” is available as of 2010.
KXCR, the newly licensed community FM noncommercial radio station, will record and archive this event for future free use when the station goes on-air with an established website for downloads.

The Club welcomes the public. The program starts at 12:00 noon, but lunch starts at 11:30 a.m., for $8, and calling ahead no later than Thursday is necessary for a meal: 541-997-3232. Ocean Dunes is located at 3345 Munsel Lake Road. The Club is a non-partisan citizen forum focused on community concerns. For more information, call Robin Sullivan, 902-7831.

Jacquie Beveridge, Co-Founder
Linda Sadler, Coordinator

Posted in Co-op Newsletter and Weekly Articles, News from the Co-op, Special Interest, Sustainable Farming | Leave a comment